Re: [exim] Exim 4.93 published.

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Ian Zimmerman
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] Exim 4.93 published.
On 2019-12-10 08:55, Jeremy Harris wrote:

> > The apparent change to store_get() signature - taking an extra
> > argument related to taint checking - isn't documented in the
> > ChangeLog, or in the Specification document either. I expect this
> > breaks any local_scan() or dlexpand code.
>
> store_get() is not part of the API documented (in local_scan.h) as
> being usable by local_scan and dlexpand code.


It is in store.h, which is #included by local_scan.h. If you take the
position that being in an included header makes it not part of the API,
then the same must hold about uschar and such, which are in mytypes.h.

Practically, how many extensions are there _not_ using store_get() ?

--
Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup.
To reply privately _only_ on Usenet and on broken lists
which rewrite From, fetch the TXT record for no-use.mooo.com.