Jeremy Harris via Exim-users <exim-users@???> (So 17 Nov 2019 21:23:47 CST): > Surely choosing implies not using the default? Which is possible, just
> by setting received_header_text to your choice.
>
> 4.next adds a (TLS1.x) comment to the default; we're too late
> in the release cycle to change the upcoming release.
Ok, considering the importance of the information, @Jeremy,
how big is the risk of braking anything, if we extend the default header
information to include the TLS version? If I understood well, it was
there before, but is missing now.
Maybe this would ask us adding another RC iteration, but I'd go for
it.
