https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2349
Neustradamus@??? changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |Neustradamus@???
--- Comment #2 from Neustradamus@??? ---
July 2011: RFC6331: Moving DIGEST-MD5 to Historic:
-
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6331
--------------------------------------------------------------
"When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be
preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD
be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802]".
Can you add support for?
- SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS):
--
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5802
--
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6120
- SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS):
--
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7677 since 2015-11-02
--
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8600 since 2019-06-21:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/suJMmeMhuAOmGn_PJYgX5Vm8lNA
I add SCRAM-SHA-512(-PLUS):
https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/hash-recommendations.html
Linked to:
-
https://github.com/scram-xmpp/info/issues/1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
