Author: ph10 Date: To: Zoltán Herczeg CC: pcre-dev@exim.org Subject: Re: [pcre-dev] Remove some restrictions of lookbehind assertions
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019, Zoltán Herczeg wrote:
> If we consider the following pattern:
> /(*napla:a|a)+/
>
> is the same as:
> /(?:(*napla:a|a))+/
>
> Then we have an empty match if I understand correctly the behavior of
> this new construct.
Oh, sorry, I was thinking of
(*MARK:X)(?:abc(*MOVE:X))+
which is not an empty match. Your example is indeed an empty match.
