https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1895
Phil Pennock <pdp@???> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Group| |exim-security
--- Comment #12 from Phil Pennock <pdp@???> ---
(In reply to Jeremy Harris from comment #11)
> If so, assuming the p for a parameter has been chosen as a "safe prime",
> q is entirely dependent on p - which we have from the PEM representation.
> Why do we care about loading q?
FWIW: I have no idea. I almost knew, once, when Viktor explained it before.
This again is part of why I try to stick to using crypto-engineering, not
crypto policy, and defer to experts.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
