Re: [exim] Header question, X-Relay-User

Page principale
Supprimer ce message
Répondre à ce message
Auteur: Heiko Schlittermann
Date:  
À: exim-users
Sujet: Re: [exim] Header question, X-Relay-User
jan-jun.2019--- via Exim-users <exim-users@???> (Mo 04 Mär 2019 19:32:53 CET):
> > $ exim -bV
> > Exim version 4.92 #3 built 11-Feb-2019 21:35:34
>
> "Mine" / the version my hoster is running is:
>
> $ exim --version
> Exim version 4.82 #3 built 10-Feb-2018 19:43:33


ohoh, from Exim's perspective this is quite old

    tag exim-4_82
    Tagger: Todd Lyons <tlyons@???>
    Date:   Mon Oct 28 05:51:09 2013 -0700


… but, anyway, you distro (Ubuntu you said) tracks backports security
relevant changes. But not function enhancemnts.

> Berkeley DB: Berkeley DB 5.3.28: (September 9, 2013)


> Configuration file is /var/lib/exim4/config.autogenerated


If this configuration file doesn't contain x-relay-user (caseless),
then we're quite sure, that Exim does not add this header.

Given, that this is the instance of Exim that is used for mail
transport.

If so, then you should be able to modify the remote_smtp transport
(the name is not fixed, but *this* name is quite common). In case of
daubt, check the log files (/var/log/exim4/mainlog*) for hints about the
transport in use.

The remove_header (ACL) or headers_remove (routers, transports)
can be used to remove the unwanted header, if it is not added by Exim.

    Best regards from Dresden/Germany
    Viele Grüße aus Dresden
    Heiko Schlittermann
--
 SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
 Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} -
 gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE -
 ! key id 7CBF764A and 972EAC9F are revoked since 2015-01 ------------ -