[exim-dev] [Bug 2359] GnuTLS breakage with outgoing TLS 1.3

Etusivu
Poista viesti
Vastaa
Lähettäjä: admin
Päiväys:  
Vastaanottaja: exim-dev
Aihe: [exim-dev] [Bug 2359] GnuTLS breakage with outgoing TLS 1.3
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2359

Git Commit <git@???> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |git@???


--- Comment #2 from Git Commit <git@???> ---
Git commit:
https://git.exim.org/exim.git/commitdiff/518b70e9d6f6e221e08aebd117bf85745f52c06d

commit 518b70e9d6f6e221e08aebd117bf85745f52c06d
Author:     Heiko Schlittermann (HS12-RIPE) <hs@???>
AuthorDate: Wed Dec 26 12:04:29 2018 +0100
Commit:     Heiko Schlittermann (HS12-RIPE) <hs@???>
CommitDate: Thu Dec 27 14:36:19 2018 +0100


    Update Changelog for GnuTLS and TLS 1.3 Bug 2359


    Fix is in 4896a3192ffac48885347460377edcd893eb9600
---
 doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog | 10 +++-------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)


diff --git a/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog b/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog
index ec7c8ac..806081b 100644
--- a/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog
+++ b/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog
@@ -5,13 +5,6 @@ affect Exim's operation, with an unchanged configuration file.
For new
options, and new features, see the NewStuff file next to this ChangeLog.


-Exim version 4.93
------------------
-
-JH/01 GnuTLS: repeat lowlevel read and write operations while they return
error
-      codes indicating retry.  Under TLS1.3 this becomes required.
-
-
 Exim version 4.92
 -----------------


@@ -187,6 +180,9 @@ JH/39 OpenSSL: clear the error stack after an SSL_accept().
 With anon-auth
       accept; this results in impossible error messages when a later operation
       actually does fail.


+AM/01 Bug 2359: GnuTLS: repeat lowlevel read and write operations while they
return error
+      codes indicating retry.  Under TLS1.3 this becomes required.
+


Exim version 4.91
-----------------

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.