https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2326
--- Comment #4 from Philip Hazel <ph10@???> ---
Yes (I assume) because there was a big refactoring of pcre2_match() for release
10.30, which cleaned up a lot of mess with regard to the handling of captures.
Previously there was a big refactoring of pcre2_compile() for 10.23, which
sorted out forward-reference issues. Glad to hear you won't be posting any more
PCRE1 bugs. :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
