Jeremy Harris via Exim-users <exim-users@???> writes:
> On 16/10/2018 12:44, Kamil Jońca via Exim-users wrote:
>> Jeremy Harris via Exim-users <exim-users@???> writes:
>>
>> [..]
>>> It does seem somewhat... arrogant of systemd to assume that
>>> when a process it has started terminates, any of its children
>> Ahem. :)
>>
>> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/10299
>
> I think we need slightly better justification for
> the "might have been ok design in 1995, but not now"
> assertion.
I do not know if it is clear: this is not my words, neither I agreed
with them (please note, that I opened this issue on github.)
I agreed that systemd should allow exim to work on current rules. But I
don know how can I argue to Lennart Poettering to change his mind.
KJ
--
http://wolnelektury.pl/wesprzyj/teraz/
Are you mentally here at Pizza Hut??
