No, it looks the same in the mailbox but I have some procmail filters which
handle incoming mail. And that can be a problem. Thanks!
пн, 1 окт. 2018 г. в 18:28, Wolfgang Breyha via Exim-users <
exim-users@???>:
> Александр Кириллов via Exim-users wrote on 01/10/2018 16:55:
> > Thanks, Wolfgang. Didn't really help much with the part I'm interested:
> >
> > X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (2.1 points) * -1.0
> ALL_TRUSTED
> > Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes
> spam
> > probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 5.0 GTUBE BODY: Generic
> > Test
> > for Unsolicited Bulk Email
>
> How do you add that? It definitely looks better here:
> X-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-2.6 points)
> * 1.0 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
> * -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
> * manager
> * 0.3 MIME_8BIT_HEADER Message header contains 8-bit character
> * 1.0 FROM_EXCESS_BASE64 From: base64 encoded unnecessarily
> ....
>
> And it ever did since 2006;-)
>
> Or is it possible that your MUA messes with header whitespace?
>
> Greetings, Wolfgang
> --
> Wolfgang Breyha <wbreyha@???> | https://www.blafasel.at/
> Vienna University Computer Center | Austria
>
>
> --
> ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
>
