Re: [pcre-dev] Bactracking controls in subroutines

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M\the complete thread tree sorted by date
MMph10 at <-
M 
Delete this message
Author: ND
Date:  
To: Pcre-dev
Subject: Re: [pcre-dev] Bactracking controls in subroutines
On 2018-07-12 16:55, ph10 wrote:

>There are no subroutine calls in the second, so it looks like a Perl bug.

You are right. It's a bug.

> I will report it.

Can you please also report about Perl inconsistence that we discuss in "No
capture in nested negative assertions"?


This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Pcre-dev
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [pcre-dev] (*SKIP:NAME) when (*MARK:NAME) is in assertionRe: [pcre-dev] (*SKIP:NAME) when (*MARK:NAME) is in assertion->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)