https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2266
--- Comment #4 from Jeremy Harris <jgh146exb@???> ---
We used to do a new TLS conn for every message, within a continued SMTP conn.
To the extent that still holds, the multi-domain changes in the proposed coding
might not be needed. On the other hand, I spent some time adding support for
continued-TLS conns (cf. 875512a361) and use of multi-domain vs. a $domain
value
of SNI needs to consider that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
