[Pcre-svn] [917] code/trunk: Oops, forgot about "-C bsr" in…

Top Page
Delete this message
Author: Subversion repository
Date:  
To: pcre-svn
Subject: [Pcre-svn] [917] code/trunk: Oops, forgot about "-C bsr" in previous patch.
Revision: 917
          http://www.exim.org/viewvc/pcre2?view=rev&revision=917
Author:   ph10
Date:     2018-02-19 17:00:45 +0000 (Mon, 19 Feb 2018)
Log Message:
-----------
Oops, forgot about "-C bsr" in previous patch.


Modified Paths:
--------------
    code/trunk/ChangeLog
    code/trunk/src/pcre2test.c


Modified: code/trunk/ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- code/trunk/ChangeLog    2018-02-19 16:55:47 UTC (rev 916)
+++ code/trunk/ChangeLog    2018-02-19 17:00:45 UTC (rev 917)
@@ -17,7 +17,8 @@
 3. Running "pcre2test -C" always stated "\R matches CR, LF, or CRLF only", 
 whatever the build configuration was. It now correctly says "\R matches all 
 Unicode newlines" in the default case when --enable-bsr-anycrlf has not been 
-specified.
+specified. Similarly, running "pcfre2test -C bsr" never produced the result 
+ANY.



Version 10.31 12-February-2018

Modified: code/trunk/src/pcre2test.c
===================================================================
--- code/trunk/src/pcre2test.c    2018-02-19 16:55:47 UTC (rev 916)
+++ code/trunk/src/pcre2test.c    2018-02-19 17:00:45 UTC (rev 917)
@@ -7793,7 +7793,7 @@
     {
     case CONF_BSR:
     (void)PCRE2_CONFIG(coptlist[i].value, &optval);
-    printf("%s\n", optval? "ANYCRLF" : "ANY");
+    printf("%s\n", (optval == PCRE2_BSR_ANYCRLF)? "ANYCRLF" : "ANY");
     break;


     case CONF_FIX: