On 2017-12-13 admin@??? wrote:
> https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2201
> --- Comment #12 from Jeremy Harris <jgh146exb@???> ---
> d21bf20 fixes the reproducer I created for the report with the re-open of the
> bug. It turned out to actually be a different issue, in flushing input between
> detecting an overlong header line and accepting further SMTP commands. The
> flush
> is required in its own right, but has the side-effect of dropping us out of
> BDAT-handling mode.
Hello,
could you please spell out what the actual effects of the issue fixed by
this patch are? Another security vulnarability, data loss, none of the
above?
Thanks, cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
