On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 03:16:25PM +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> On 07/10/17 14:14, The Doctor wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 12:25:35AM -0400, Phil Pennock wrote:
> >> Is the Exim binary setuid?
>
> >
> > This is ufs and the exim binary is set to 1755
>
> That's a "no", then; at least on my FreeBSD system here,
> "1755" shows as "rwxr-xr-t" with "ls -l". That leading
> "1" is a sticky-bit not a setuid bit.
>
Correction 4755
>
> > In file included from ./exim.h:492:
> > ./macros.h:231:3: error: expected identifier
> > DTYPE_NONE,
> > ^
> > /usr/include/sys/file.h:56:20: note: expanded from macro 'DTYPE_NONE'
> > #define DTYPE_NONE 0 /* not yet initialized */
> > ^
>
>
> This looks like a system include on FreeBSD has defined a name
> which exim was already defining for its own purposes; a conflict.
> Someone else mentioned this recently but I don't recall the
> outcome. For now I suggest you edit all mentions of "DTYPE_NONE"
> in the exim source to "EXIM_DTYPE_NONE".
>
Just somethig we should be aware of.
> --
> Cheers,
> Jeremy
>
> --
> ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Talk Sense to a fool and he calls you foolish - Euripides
