https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677
--- Comment #5 from Peter Gervai <grin@???> ---
It is *not* the same test. sender <> header_sender. It is not even the same
subroutine. What's your point?
I can do it with sender, since it does accept no_cache option; this is not
available for header_sender. The documentation say nowehere that sender_header
is forced to use cached *sender* result [a different acl command] if it exist,
regardless of option clash.
Also I do not remember that the documentation said anywhere that I am not
allowed to make same tests in separate places with different options. I
understand that this is your opinion, but I'd prefer if it would work according
to the documentation instead. Also I strongly disagree with your opinion, so by
any means this is not a request to change the documentation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
