On 30/08/17 06:45, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > When a sub-ACL is "called" from another one by means of the "acl ="
> modifier, are acl_m_* variables settings by the inner ACL visible
> downstream for checking and expansion?
If by "downstream" you mean "by an ancestor", yes.
But you might not... You've not been bitten by the documented
lifetime of _m_ variables?