Ian Zimmerman <itz@???> (Mo 26 Jun 2017 17:15:34 CEST):
…
> Why is the RCPT ACL preferable for this? Just curious.
Hm. Right. As long as the decision is independend on the recipient, you
can do it in your MAIL ACL.
I tend to collect all actions in the RCPT ACL.
> I started collecting all settings that I _always_ want in acl_smtp_mail,
> and this would be a natural addition, I think. Or is there a reason
> against it?
The RCPT ACL already knows the recipient. That's important to accept
messages to postmaster, abuse, and such, even if the sender is invalid,
the EHLO data doesn't match the IP, and whatever checks you do to reject
a message.
Best regards from Dresden/Germany
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} -
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE -
! key id 7CBF764A and 972EAC9F are revoked since 2015-01 ------------ -
