Autore: Boylan, Ross Data: To: Lena@lena.kiev.ua, exim-users@exim.org Oggetto: Re: [exim] TLS error on connection to smtp.office365.com
(gnutls_handshake): An unexpected TLS packet was received.
I know I'm connecting to port 587 since I specified it explicitly. But I don't understand the relevance to my problem.
Are you saying that when exim communicates with 587 it expects to negotiate TLS immediately? >From experiments with telnet it seems clear the server does a regular greeting and then expects EHLO and STARTTLS. This seems consistent with the relevant RFC (6409 seems the most current).
Or perhaps you are saying that my use of 587 was only partly effective?
Ross
________________________________________
From: Exim-users <exim-users-bounces+ross.boylan=ucsf.edu@???> on behalf of Lena--- via Exim-users <exim-users@???>
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 4:32 AM
To: exim-users@???
Subject: Re: [exim] TLS error on connection to smtp.office365.com (gnutls_handshake): An unexpected TLS packet was received.
> The exim debug logs sort of look as if it is expecting to negotiate TLS
> immediately on connection, rather than after the initial EHLO
Yes. Look where the 465 came from:
> Transport port=465 replaced by host-specific port=587
