On 2017-02-28 09:56, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> We could develop another lookup which does (docs ch.61), or we could
> enhance the ${readsocket } expansion to talk UDP (bug 410) and require
> the DNS protocol be explicit by the user.
>
> Volunteers for the coding?
I'll look into it :) But I'm also thinking of my fuse idea in parallel.
--
Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups
Personal signed mail: please _encrypt_ and sign
Don't clear-text sign:
http://cr.yp.to/smtp/8bitmime.html