https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1919
Jeremy Harris <jgh146exb@???> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #1 from Jeremy Harris <jgh146exb@???> ---
Use of _DH_H_ is deliberate as can be seen from the comments. While we could
invent yet another preprocessor identifier for a guard to explicitly lock
out the system db.h inclusion I'm not convinced it is worthwhile.
__SRS_H__ is not reserved as it does not begin with an underbar followed by
a letter. Thus it is legitimate for application source code use.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
