Re: [exim] QT=... DT=... vs timestamp

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: James Gibbard
Date:  
To: Frank Elsner
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] QT=... DT=... vs timestamp
Broken? Nope. QT includes the time spent submitting the message to
Exim, which ENDS with the first logline, at the start of DT. Look at
syslog and determine the time that the cron was supposed to start and
I'd bet it was 4AM.

Thus you probably have some issue on your mailserver that means
messages take a long time to submit at 4AM, rather than the QT time is
calculated incorrectly.

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Frank Elsner
<frank@???> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 10:24:09 +0200 Frank Elsner wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> the QT= computation must be broken :-(
>>
>> 2016-10-04 04:29:46 1brF1V-0005H0-Gs <= redacted@??? U=root P=local S=600232 T="Cron <root@redacted> /usr/local/sbin/Mirror" from <root@???> for root
>> 2016-10-04 04:29:56 1brF1V-0005H0-Gs => redacted@??? F=<redacted@???> R=remote T=smtp S=608364 H=mail.shuttle.de [194.95.249.4] X=TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256 A=client C="250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 20F1AC1" QT=29m55s DT=10s
>> 2016-10-04 04:29:56 1brF1V-0005H0-Gs Completed QT=29m55s
>
> Let me add that the problem occurs obviously only at 4 o'clock.
> The minute goes into the QT. See this log lines:
>
> 2016-10-01 04:12:34 1bq9ar-0004Gb-BO Completed QT=12m33s
> 2016-10-02 04:41:30 1bqW4P-00015A-L0 Completed QT=41m29s
> 2016-10-03 04:19:05 1bqsXx-0006NC-Lh Completed QT=19m4s
> 2016-10-04 04:29:56 1brF1V-0005H0-Gs Completed QT=29m55s
> 2016-10-05 04:11:03 1brbV3-0001bN-HA Completed QT=11m2s
>
>
> --Frank Elsner
>
> --
> ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/