Hi, Peter -
If you're asking what I think you are, we operate a similar setup.
As you say, Round-Robin isn't a great solution as there can be lengthy
delays before the client gives up on an IP address and tried the other.
Also some clients might only try the first of the set of IPs and not bother
trying others if it can't connect.
We use two VMs running Exim under Ubuntu, although you can have as many as
you want. These act as our mail relays, accepting incoming messages and
routing them onward to the delivery hosts/wherever.
These have a load balancer front end: a pair of servers running the (free)
Linux Virtual Server (LVS) load balancer software under Ubuntu. These poll
the Exim services on ports 25, 465 and 587 and route connections to both
servers using a Least Connections policy.
If one of the backend servers goes down the LVS quickly notices — we have
it set to do its health check poll every 5–10 seconds: I can't remember
which — and routes incoming traffic to the remaining server.
We publish the DNS name and IP address of the front end load balancer and
clients connect to this, which then routes the connection onward.
Our backend Eixm servers are separate, standalone systems; they *do not* share
a filestore with a single queue, but instead each have their own. This
means that if one server goes down then any messages held in its queue are
delayed until it's brought back up. However because we're using VMs instead
of physical hardware this can be done quickly within our VMware estate. But
if you are still running physical hardware then it's something you need to
be aware of as it can take a while to get spare parts delivered/fitted.
Cheers,
Mike B-)
On 16 August 2016 at 12:07, Peter Leeman <Peter.Leeman@???> wrote:
> We have an Exim server that only acts as a relay server and does not
> hold/manage recipient mailboxes. Can anyone suggest a (free but good)
> method for implementing failover for this box.
>
> There needs to be a level of intelligence to determine if the server is up
> or down as a lot of the emails that go through this relay are generated by
> scripts or multifunction printers that don't hold emails for resending. I
> was thinking about DNS round-robin but this would not be suitable. Also
> some of the applications that generate mail have to use IP addresses and
> will not accept DNS names.
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
>
> --
> ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
--
Systems Administrator & Change Manager
IT Services, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
Tel: +44-(0)1904-323811
Web:
www.york.ac.uk/it-services
Disclaimer:
www.york.ac.uk/docs/disclaimer/email.htm
