On Wed, 2016-07-27 at 15:35 -0400, John C Klensin wrote:
> And that, I thought, was the case we were being asked about.
> What I was trying to clarify was the difference between "don't
> configure things that way because it is a bad idea" as compared
> to "don't do it because it is strictly prohibited". The bottom
> line is "don't do it" either way.
Perhaps RFCs (Requests For Comments) should be written in a more
authoritarian style - that demonstrates clear leadership - rather than,
in the instances I read, so passively it encourages the clue-less to
ignore common sense to the detriment of many ?
That is my only comment.
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU. England's place is in the European Union.
