Re: [exim] Exim not always logging Message-ID

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 05:41:36PM +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> On 19/06/16 21:44, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> > But I do not see any harm in logging the fixed message id w/o a new log
> > selector. What reason do we have not the use id=??? even for a generated
> > (fixed) id?
>
> Someone could be looking for acceptance lines lacking an id= field.

Presence of fh= header solves this issue, isn't it?
--
Eugene Berdnikov