Chip <jeffschips@???> (Di 28 Jun 2016 23:15:03 CEST):
> So the Wikipedia article basically suggests there are many variants.
> Interesting. It's been my experience that almost all mail systems honor the
> bounces-to (which *sometimes* is based off the From or Reply-To unless the
> field bounces-to is set in the headers, it seems.)
I still do not see any Bounces-To header mentioned there.
> Notice the samples below which prove out my point in that regard:
>
> Return-path: <EverydayFood@???>
> Envelope-to: loot@???
> From: "Everyday Food - MarthaStewart.com"
> <EverydayFood@???>
> To: "loot@???" <loot@???>
> Reply-To: support@???
>
> Return-path: <barney@???>
> Envelope-to: loot@???
> From: Stan <stan@???>
> Bounces-To: barney@???
They're free to use any header they want… Maybe some broken mail
sysstems even hounour Bounces-To. But please, show me, which relevant
RFC mentions this header.
Best regards from Dresden/Germany
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} -
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE -
! key id 7CBF764A and 972EAC9F are revoked since 2015-01 ------------ -
