Re: [exim] Is not honoring bounces-to violation of RFC?

Chip <jeffschips@???> (Di 28 Jun 2016 21:59:35 CEST):
> My mistake NOT "bounces-to" rather "return-path" as in the following snippet
> of campaign emails from Home Depot, Martha Stewart and Sears:

Maybe this helps.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounce_address

And reading the above article I just learned that my terminology
was wrong too, 'envelope from' I meant where I used 'envelope sender'.

--
Heiko