In message <5772955E.8040705@???>, Chip <jeffschips@???>
writes
>If a receiver of campaign emails (that promotes itself as an email
>security service) sends bounces to "reply-to" rather than "bounces-to"
>as a policy despite bounces-to present in all campaign emails headers,
>would this be considered a violation of RFCs?
which RFC do you believe defines "bounces-to" ?
this header doesn't even make it into the IANA list
<
http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/message-
headers.xhtml#prov-headers>
- --
richard Richard Clayton
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov 1755
