https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1788
--- Comment #23 from Alex Presland <exim@???> ---
Now that I've got a simple scenario where I can re-create the issue, I thought
that I'd manually request the delivery with all debug turned on.
=== MAILQ listing start: Thu Apr 7 01:39:01 BST 2016
3m 9.0K 1anxua-00022H-8S <alex@???>
alex.test2@???
D alex@???
pete.test2@???
rob.test2@???
=== MAILQ listing complete: Thu Apr 7 01:39:01 BST 2016
I then ran:
root@servername:~# sudo exim4 -d+all -M 1anxua-00022H-8S
After that command, there was nothing in the mailq.
The output from the manual delivery request included:
01:40:02 8745 Non-recipients:
01:40:02 8745 -->spamcatcher2@??? [0]
01:40:02 8745 -->filtered-alex@??? [0]
01:40:02 8745 | -->filtered-alex.presland@??? [0]
01:40:02 8745 -->alextest@??? [1]
01:40:02 8745 | -->alex@??? [0]
01:40:02 8745 | -->alexuser@??? [0]
01:40:02 8745 | |
-->/home/spamcatcher2/Maildir/.testing_archive/:spamcatcher2@???
[0]
01:40:02 8745 -->/home/alextest/Maildir/:alextest@???
[2]
01:40:02 8745 -->/home/alex/Maildir/:alexuser@???
[0]
01:40:02 8745 ---- End of tree ----
01:40:02 8745 recipients_count=4
01:40:02 8745 body_linecount=215 message_linecount=30
01:40:02 8745 Delivery address list:
01:40:02 8745 alex.test2@???
01:40:02 8745 pete.test2@???
01:40:02 8745 rob.test2@???
[SNIP]
01:40:02 8745 opened hints database /var/spool/exim4/db/retry: flags=O_RDONLY
01:40:02 8745 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
01:40:02 8745 Considering: spamcatcher2@???
01:40:02 8745 unique = spamcatcher2@???
01:40:02 8745 spamcatcher2@??? was previously delivered:
discarded
01:40:02 8745 alex.test2@???: children all complete
01:40:02 8745 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
01:40:02 8745 Considering: spamcatcher2@???
01:40:02 8745 unique = spamcatcher2@???
01:40:02 8745 spamcatcher2@??? was previously delivered:
discarded
01:40:02 8745 pete.test2@???: children all complete
01:40:02 8745 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
01:40:02 8745 Considering: spamcatcher2@???
01:40:02 8745 unique = spamcatcher2@???
01:40:02 8745 spamcatcher2@??? was previously delivered:
discarded
01:40:02 8745 rob.test2@???: children all complete
01:40:02 8745 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
[SNIP]
01:40:02 8745 Processing retry items
01:40:02 8745 Succeeded addresses:
01:40:02 8745 alex.test2@???: no retry items
01:40:02 8745 pete.test2@???: no retry items
01:40:02 8745 rob.test2@???: no retry items
01:40:02 8745 Failed addresses:
01:40:02 8745 Deferred addresses:
01:40:02 8745 end of retry processing
01:40:02 8745 LOG: MAIN
01:40:02 8745 Completed
01:40:02 8745 end delivery of 1anxua-00022H-8S
01:40:02 8745 search_tidyup called
01:40:02 8745 search_tidyup called
01:40:02 8745 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Exim pid=8745 terminating with rc=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So, despite the initial running of the .forward in the spamcatcher2 requesting
significant deliveries, the hints file is later incorrectly declaring that
they've already been delivered.
One question from me: when a .forward requests a significant delivery to be
made, why isn't this queued instead of the original email?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
