Many thanks, Jeremy: I was wondering if I'd misunderstood what cutthrough
delivery was intended for and it perhaps only applied to the response after
the DATA section.
Would you still like to see the log or are you OK now without it?
Cheers,
Mike B-)
On 1 March 2016 at 21:02, Jeremy Harris <jgh@???> wrote:
> On 29/02/16 18:30, Mike Brudenell wrote:
> > I'm going crackers here: I though I understood cutthrough_delivery but am
> > now baffled why it's not detecting an invalid recipient address.
>
> > Have I found a bug?
>
> Looking more closely, you're not crackers and it's a bug.
> I'd weasel and call it a "deficiency" if the docs weren't
> so definite...
>
> Until I get the fix into git, plonk this just under the
> line setting cutthrough mode:
>
> verify = recipient/callout=use_sender
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Jeremy
>
>
> --
> ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
>
--
Systems Administrator & Change Manager
IT Services, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
Tel: +44-(0)1904-323811
Web:
www.york.ac.uk/it-services
Disclaimer:
www.york.ac.uk/docs/disclaimer/email.htm
