https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189
--- Comment #4 from Zoltan Herczeg <hzmester@???> ---
Hi,
I am sorry for not doing anything with this bug, it issue should likely be
closed by now. Unfortunately Dmitry only provided a pattern without input, so
it is hard to tell whether it is fixed. Anyway, based on the description (date,
pcre16 branch, jit specific), I suspect I mentioned the following patch:
https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20111223.203732.252e5e68.en.html
since \b depends on skip_char_back().
Do you see any difference with the output of those two commands? Unfortunately
the person did not report the difference.
There is one more thing I want to mention. Currently PCRE2-JIT improvements are
ported back to PCRE1, which provides a nice speedup, but might also introduce
errors.
Regards,
Zoltan
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
