On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 04:17:16PM +0000, Ian Eiloart wrote:
>
> > On 5 Jan 2016, at 22:31, The Doctor <doctor@???> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 10:23:30PM +0000, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> >> On 05/01/16 22:02, The Doctor wrote:
> >>> I was wondering at this time if the next EXIM release should be
> >>> openssl 1.1 ready.
> >>>
> >>> There are some new features in openssl 1.1 and some have been
> >>> removed.
> >>
> >> We're too close to release now for such an effort to start,
> >> and I'm not aware of anyone having worked on it so far.
> >>
> >> If you have specific feature requests, a/some bug/s is probably
> >> a good move so they don't get forgotten.
> >
> > Then the next release it is.
> >
> > With Openssl 1.1 coming out, major patches will have
> > to occur.
>
> I???ve taken the liberty of opening Bug 1771.
>
> https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1771
>
A further addendum when I add the DEPRECATED flag is
In file included from tls.c:120:
tls-openssl.c: In function `rsa_callback':
tls-openssl.c:247: `RSA_F4' undeclared (first use in this function)
tls-openssl.c:247: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
tls-openssl.c:247: for each function it appears in.)
tls-openssl.c:247: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
Fun stuff now that Openssl wants to fix
security flaws.
> --
> Ian Eiloart
> Postmaster, University of Sussex
> +44 (0) 1273 87-3148
>
--
For effective Internet Etiquette and communications read
http://catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html,
http://idallen.com/topposting.html
&
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html
