Hi Rainer,
Rainer Dorsch <ml@???> (Sa 12 Dez 2015 17:55:19 CET):
…
> Dec 12 16:53:03 netcup exim4[13510]: 14658 Condition is true: error_message
Without consulting any documentation I'd say an 'error_message'
condition is true, if the message's sender is empty.
> In my case it is definitely no delivery failure message and from the log for me no
> obvious other error is visible either (the "no IP address found for host" shows also on
> some other messages which work ok).
>
> Does anybody see why the message below triggers an error_message?
>
Contact from the remote sender:
> Dec 12 16:52:58 netcup exim4[13510]: 13852 Connection request from 115.73.16.126 port 26375
…
Recipient verification:
> Dec 12 16:53:00 netcup exim4[13510]: 14645 R: system_aliases for metzingen@???
> Dec 12 16:53:00 netcup exim4[13510]: 14645 R: system_aliases for rd@???
> Dec 12 16:53:00 netcup exim4[13510]: 14645 R: lowuid_aliases for rd@???
> Dec 12 16:53:00 netcup exim4[13510]: 14645 R: local_user for rd@???
Content scan via spamd:
> Dec 12 16:53:00 netcup exim4[13510]: 14645 trying server 127.0.0.1, port 783
Now, as it passed all checks, we accept (and log) the message.
> Dec 12 16:53:03 netcup exim4[13510]: 14645 LOG: MAIN
And the message has an empty (<>) sender. This it's an error message:
> Dec 12 16:53:03 netcup exim4[13510]: 14645 <= <> H=(115.73.55.172) [115.73.16.126] P=smtp S=2605
Best regards from Dresden/Germany
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} -
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE -
! key id 7CBF764A and 972EAC9F are revoked since 2015-01 ------------ -
