On 18/11/15 06:23, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> Jeremy Harris <jgh@???> (Di 17 Nov 2015 15:02:25 CET):
>> On 17/11/15 13:02, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
>>> exim -C /dev/null -bP primary_hostname
>>> exim -C <(echo primary_hostname=foo) -bP primary_hostname
>>>
>>> With the default being tls_advertise_hosts = *, this above line issue
>>> all that ugly warnings about missing tls_* support files.
>>
>> How about suppressing the tls warnings when -bP is used?
>
> Ok, I've implemented this, using the existing 'checking' variable in exim.c.
> Now I set this in -bP and -brw too.
not -brt ?
and...
>
> But, ~ exim.c:3490
>
> if …
> (
> list_options &&
> (checking || smtp_input || extract_recipients ||
> filter_test != FTEST_NONE || bi_option)
> ) ||
> … then issue "incompatible options"
>
> Are there security reasons, or may I change this to
>
> if …
> (
> list_options &&
> - (checking || smtp_input || extract_recipients ||
> + (smtp_input || extract_recipients ||
> filter_test != FTEST_NONE || bi_option)
> ) ||
> … then issue "incompatible options"
no, that would not be good; the combination "-be -bP" would
then be allowed, and it makes no sense.
I think you need (list_options || list_config) instead there,
and don't set "checking" for -bP.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
