https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1708
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Metzler <eximusers@???> ---
(In reply to Jeremy Harris from comment #1)
[...]
> "armel" ? Is this a processor architecture/model - if so, what endianness
> and does it support misaligned accesses?
Hello,
armel is little-endian (More details here:
https://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort ), the handling of misaligned accesses
seems to be configurable but fgive garbled results by default:
https://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiFixes#word_accesses_must_be_aligned_to_a_multiple_of_their_size
>> a rewriting rule is found
> How does the Exim config make use of the /etc/email-addresses file?
> Is this a rewrite in Exim terminology, per Chapter 31 of the spec?
> If so, since it sounds reproducible, can we get a debug run including at
> least "rewrite" and "expand" options (plus any others felt relevant)?
Yes, this is exim rewriting:
--------------------
*@+local_domains "${lookup{${local_part}}lsearch{/etc/email-addresses}\
{$value}fail}" Ffrs
# identical rewriting rule for /etc/mailname
*@ETC_MAILNAME "${lookup{${local_part}}lsearch{/etc/email-addresses}\
{$value}fail}" Ffrs
--------------------
I will ask the bug submitter to add the missing reponses directly here.
cu Andreas
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
