On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 08:45:18PM +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> On 20/08/15 18:24, fBXzK kEl1q wrote:
> > Thanks, that explanation sounds plausible on first glance. But can it
> > be confirmed in the originally attached debug log?
>
> Here:
>
> 17:07:39 10433 After routing:
> 17:07:39 10433 Local deliveries:
> 17:07:39 10433 example.com@???
> 17:07:39 10433 Remote deliveries:
> 17:07:39 10433 example.com@???
> 17:07:39 10433 Failed addresses:
> 17:07:39 10433 Deferred addresses:
> 17:07:39 10433 search_tidyup called
> 17:07:39 10433 \0\example.com@??? is a duplicate address: discarded
Jeremy, it really misleads because "Remote deliveries" list is not empty,
it contains "example.com@???" and a transport assigned for it.
Then, it is unclear which copy is discarded -- printout is not good.
And such behaviour seems as a bug, because address is not reinjected
for routing, it have been accepted by router and got its transport.
The second "working" example of config shows a contradicting result
for effectively the same configuration.
--
Eugene Berdnikov
