Re: [exim] Exim4 vs Gmail - DKIM algorithms incompatibility

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: LinuxAdmin
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] Exim4 vs Gmail - DKIM algorithms incompatibility
Hi Jon Gerdes,

Pls find the complete header for my mail. At DNS level the Public key
entered correcly rest of the Domains like Yahoo susccessfully verified it.

======================================================================================
Delivered-To: lcnet20150602@???
Received: by 10.202.174.140 with SMTP id x134csp1464346oie;
        Mon, 13 Jul 2015 04:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.234.142 with SMTP id 
f136mr53828725qhc.16.1436787389747;
        Mon, 13 Jul 2015 04:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <tracy@???>
Received: from ovh2.vpsemailsrvr.com (ovh2.vpsemailsrvr.com. [192.95.30.44])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 
f19si20232787qhc.91.2015.07.13.04.36.28
        for <lcnet20150602@???>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Mon, 13 Jul 2015 04:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of tracy@??? 
designates 192.95.30.44 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.95.30.44;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: domain of tracy@??? designates 
192.95.30.44 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=tracy@???;
       dkim=fail header.i=@legaljobsinusa.com;
       dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=legaljobsinusa.com
Message-ID: <55a3a2bd.13ea8c0a.b7157.1751SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@???>
X-Google-Original-Message-ID: <1436787387.<tracy@???>>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; 
d=legaljobsinusa.com; s=dkim;
    h=Date:Message-ID:from:Subject:To; 
bh=hbHsegzs2riFX6atLQLOBj5njrfb8Jzzj1yEZQ8DixY=;
    b=P0W3Cq9rKYM0fWsA+G8KSV9uV3BbOXA3F3C8IaP3iH7dNo1/TjXJWuRvB9vPLKEs/NQ8rWGX9WYdJ0wMk0ZYLSZ/cysjmgNgnEDwPy5ADKTSvwVYy9duRU9j30Fqf/9xLdS8Lai4k1cWU+DrCA8yPDn4AaRiejceq4Ks6gV3wfA=;
Received: from root by ovh2.vpsemailsrvr.com with local (Exim 4.84)
    (envelope-from <tracy@???>)
    id 1ZEc27-0006UX-AJ
    for lcnet20150602@???; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:36:27 -0500
To: lcnet20150602@???
Subject:  Hi Ravi This is your info
from: <tracy@???>
X-virtual-MTA: virtualgroup1r
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:36:27 -0500


Hi Ravi This is your
info=========================================================================================================================Also
pls find output of "exim -bV"# exim -bVExim version 4.84 #2 built
09-Oct-2014 09:21:51Copyright (c) University of Cambridge, 1995 - 2014(c)
The Exim Maintainers and contributors in ACKNOWLEDGMENTS file, 2007 -
2014Berkeley DB: Berkeley DB 4.7.25: (April 4, 2012)Support for: crypteq
iconv() IPv6 PAM Perl Expand_dlfunc TCPwrappers OpenSSL Content_Scanning
DKIM Old_Demime PRDR OCSP Experimental_SPF Experimental_SRS
Experimental_DMARC Experimental_Proxy Experimental_TPDA
Experimental_CertnamesLookups (built-in): lsearch wildlsearch nwildlsearch
iplsearch cdb dbm dbmjz dbmnz dnsdb dsearch ldap ldapdn ldapm nis nis0
nisplus passwd sqliteLookups (as-module):Authenticators: cram_md5 cyrus_sasl
dovecot plaintext spaRouters: accept dnslookup ipliteral manualroute
queryprogram redirectTransports: appendfile/maildir/mailstore/mbx autoreply
lmtp pipe smtpFixed never_users: 0Size of off_t: 8Configuration file is
/etc/exim/exim.conf======================================================================================================================

Regards,
Dilip Jadav

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Gerdes" <gerdesj@???>
To: <exim-users@???>
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2015 5:31 AM
Subject: Re: [exim] Exim4 vs Gmail - DKIM algorithms incompatibility


> On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 16:39 +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
>> LinuxAdmin <linuxadm@???> (Fr 10 Jul 2015 13:05:08 CEST):
>> > I am facing problem in DKIM Signing for Gmail, rest all domins
>> > verify its very vell.
>> >
>
> ...
>
>> If google can't resolve
>>
>>     txt selector._domainkey.example.com

>>
>> they can't verify the domainkey signature.
>>
>> Please do not obfuscate. And, what does „exim -bV“ tell you?
>
> ...
>
> As Heiko said: Please don't obfuscate. That makes it hard to diagnose
> your problem without having to spend quality time filling in the
> missing bits.
>
> You wont lose any security in leaving email headers unmolested, unless
> you are doing it as a courtesy when quoting information about someone
> else's email. Even then, it is just a courtesy and not a security
> enhancement.
>
> However: we will probably need your selector (unless it really is
> s=selector) but never diclose your private key, for obvious reasons.
>
> Cheers
> Jon
>
>
> Blueloop Ltd
> 01460 271055
> https://www.blueloop.net
> Blueloop House, Ilchester Road, YEOVIL, BA21 3AA Registered England &
> Wales - 3981322
>
>
> --
> ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/