Re: [exim] stupid hosts using bogus rcpt to

Joshua Lokken <joshua@???> wrote:
> On Jul/08 05:38PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Daniel Tryba <d.tryba@???> wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 08 July 2015 11:54:11 Graeme Fowler wrote:

>>>> 'noreply' addresses aren't bogus as such; they're simply designed as
>>>> send-only. This is *extremely* common.

>>> But incredibly stupid, how will the sender ever know its mail isn't
>>> getting delivered to the endpoints?

>> That's his problem then, not yours, isn't it?
>
> But still a valid point, and worth mentioning, IMHO.

Right.

But a sender sending a mail without a valid (or /dev/null'd) sender
address somehow says "I can't be bothered with bounces.".

Grüße,
Sven.

--
Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.