Re: [exim] stupid hosts using bogus rcpt to

On Jul/08 05:38PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Daniel Tryba <d.tryba@???> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 08 July 2015 11:54:11 Graeme Fowler wrote:
>
> >> 'noreply' addresses aren't bogus as such; they're simply designed as
> >> send-only. This is *extremely* common.
>
> > But incredibly stupid, how will the sender ever know its mail isn't
> > getting delivered to the endpoints?
>
> That's his problem then, not yours, isn't it?

But still a valid point, and worth mentioning, IMHO.

--
Joshua