On 2015-04-13, Jeremy Harris <jgh@???> wrote: > On 13/04/15 12:19, Jasen Betts wrote:
>> On 2015-04-13, Paul Warren <pdw@???> wrote:
>> if there's fewer than 10 entries a "dsearch" lookup may be a better
>> match to the task, but creating entries is still problematic -
>> you could use embedded perl I guess.
>
> If lsearch were to be augmented with an lsearch_add,
> we'd be a-wanting dsearch_add too :)
>
> Also lsearch_del ?
also _add and _del for the other simple databases.
(dbm etc...)
perhaps using a query database like sqlite or redis makes more sense
for dynamic data.
