著者: Phil Pennock 日付: To: exim-dev 題目: Re: [exim-dev] EXPERIMENTAL_PROXY clarification
On 2015-02-10 at 14:58 +0000, matthew.schlosser@??? wrote: > The "why without?" question is answered with a long litany of security regulations, privacy laws and way too much privileged detail to make public.
>
> We currently use Sendmail, but as you may know, it doesn't scale well hence the existence of a zillion other MTAs.
>
> If Socks support is not possible I'll keep hunting unless someone feels really excited to take a crack at it and let me play Beta Tester.
>
> Thanks for the consideration and good work. I've used Exim at ISPs and enterprise shops for years. I even built a RESTful interface to programmatically manage the MTA config and queue.
>
> Here's to hoping flattery will get me everywhere,
I fully understand why SOCKS, it's one of those things which I'd need to
implement to be able to use Exim in a certain project for $work, but I
haven't had time, so I haven't put in the development work.
If the code is written and contributed, I'd be happy to review, but at
this time I'm not likely to be writing it myself.