Re: [exim-dev] EXPERIMENTAL_PROXY clarification

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: matthew.schlosser
Date:  
To: jgh, exim-dev
Subject: Re: [exim-dev] EXPERIMENTAL_PROXY clarification
The "why without?" question is answered with a long litany of security regulations, privacy laws and way too much privileged detail to make public.

We currently use Sendmail, but as you may know, it doesn't scale well hence the existence of a zillion other MTAs.

If Socks support is not possible I'll keep hunting unless someone feels really excited to take a crack at it and let me play Beta Tester.

Thanks for the consideration and good work. I've used Exim at ISPs and enterprise shops for years. I even built a RESTful interface to programmatically manage the MTA config and queue.

Here's to hoping flattery will get me everywhere,
-Matt


-----Original Message-----
From: exim-dev-bounces+matthew.schlosser=thomsonreuters.com@??? [mailto:exim-dev-bounces+matthew.schlosser=thomsonreuters.com@exim.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Harris
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 8:51 AM
To: exim-dev@???
Subject: Re: [exim-dev] EXPERIMENTAL_PROXY clarification

I think the quick answer is no....

On 10/02/15 14:33, matthew.schlosser@??? wrote:
> [...] Exim as a scalable cloud-based MTA, but without egress access to the internet.


... and the instant question: why "without"?
--
Jeremy


--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##