Re: [exim-dev] tls_verify_certificates: unset vs. forced fai…

Page principale
Supprimer ce message
Répondre à ce message
Auteur: Jeremy Harris
Date:  
À: exim-dev
Sujet: Re: [exim-dev] tls_verify_certificates: unset vs. forced failure vs. empty
On 27/11/14 14:03, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
>     option to an empty string, it's equivalent to setting it to /dev/null. It loads
>    (But, depending on tls_load_default_certificates, the default
>     certificates still may be loaded.)¹


That part conflicts with the current state of the 4.next branch,
which supports the word "system" as an alternate to a path for
tls_verify_certificates.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy