Re: [exim-dev] Should we always load the default trust store…

Góra strony
Wiadomość jest częścią wątku:
Mpełne drzewo wątku posortowane wg daty
MViktor Dukhovni at <-
MViktor Dukhovni at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autor: Jasen Betts
Data:  
Dla: exim-dev
Temat: Re: [exim-dev] Should we always load the default trust store? (was: tls_verify_certificates forced failure vs. empty) string
On 2014-11-27, Heiko Schlittermann <hs@???> wrote:
>
> And IMHO the peer crashed in cases where it used an older GnuTLS
> version or was an older Outlook (do they use GnuTLS?).
>

With the Pine source ( libc-client ) as evidence I'll claim that
Windows (since XP) has a TLS library of it's own.

--
umop apisdn


Wiadomość została wysłana do następujących list mailowych:
Exim-dev
Informacja o liście mailowej | Najbliższe wiadomości		<-Re: [exim-dev] Should we always load the default trust store? (was: tls_verify_certificates forced failure vs. empty) stringRe: [exim-dev] Should we always load the default trust store? (was: tls_verify_certificates forced failure vs. empty) string->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrowana przez cumin AdminsLurker (wersja 2.3)