Re: [exim-dev] Should we always load the default trust store…

Ce message fait partie du fil suivant :
	Arborescence complète du fil triée par date
	Viktor Dukhovni à
	Viktor Dukhovni à

Auteur: Jasen Betts
Date:
À: exim-dev
Sujet: Re: [exim-dev] Should we always load the default trust store? (was: tls_verify_certificates forced failure vs. empty) string

On 2014-11-27, Heiko Schlittermann <hs@???> wrote:
>
> And IMHO the peer crashed in cases where it used an older GnuTLS
> version or was an older Outlook (do they use GnuTLS?).
>

With the Pine source ( libc-client ) as evidence I'll claim that
Windows (since XP) has a TLS library of it's own.

--
umop apisdn

Ce message a été envoyé sur les listes de diffusion suivantes :
Exim-dev Informations sur la liste de diffusion \| Messages voisins		Re: [exim-dev] Should we always load the default trust store? (was: tls_verify_certificates forced failure vs. empty) string	Re: [exim-dev] Should we always load the default trust store? (was: tls_verify_certificates forced failure vs. empty) string

Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administré par cumin Admins

Lurker (version 2.3)