Re: [exim-dev] Should we always load the default trust store…

This message is part of the following thread:
	the complete thread tree sorted by date
	Viktor Dukhovni at
	Viktor Dukhovni at

Author: Jasen Betts
Date:
To: exim-dev
Subject: Re: [exim-dev] Should we always load the default trust store? (was: tls_verify_certificates forced failure vs. empty) string

On 2014-11-27, Heiko Schlittermann <hs@???> wrote:
>
> And IMHO the peer crashed in cases where it used an older GnuTLS
> version or was an older Outlook (do they use GnuTLS?).
>

With the Pine source ( libc-client ) as evidence I'll claim that
Windows (since XP) has a TLS library of it's own.

--
umop apisdn

This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-dev Mailing List Info \| Nearby Messages		Re: [exim-dev] Should we always load the default trust store? (was: tls_verify_certificates forced failure vs. empty) string	Re: [exim-dev] Should we always load the default trust store? (was: tls_verify_certificates forced failure vs. empty) string

Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin Admins

Lurker (version 2.3)