I don't know if anyone has every specifically tested swaks with --pipe
against an exim compiled with GnuTLS. I can't even remember where I
did the original development, but I'm pretty sure the environments are
long gone so I can't look. I'll tuck this away as a swaks bug report
and I can figure out if it's swaks' fault (which is most likely) or a
recent change in exim broke something. I'm not sure when I'll get to
it, so if anyone has any additional info it would be useful.
Thanks
--John
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Heiko Schlittermann
<hs@???> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> did somebody successfully test Swaks, Exim (GnuTLS) and the pipe mode of
> Swaks:
>
> swaks --tls --pipe 'exim -bh <ip>' …
>
> Did it work? Should it work?
>
> Even when I use a recent Swaks and a recent Exim (GnuTLS) I get:
>
> LOG: TLS error on connection from (pu.schlittermann.de) [212.80.235.130] (gnutls_handshake): A TLS packet with unexpected length was received.
> <- 220 TLS go ahead
> *** TLS startup failed (connect(): error:00000000:lib(0):func(0):reason(0))
> *** STARTTLS attempted but failed
>
> The same Exim, but compiled with OpenSSL works.
>
> pkg-config --modversion gnutls ---> 2.12.20
> pkg-config --modversion openssl ---> 1.0.1e
>
> Best regards from Dresden/Germany
> Viele Grüße aus Dresden
> Heiko Schlittermann
> --
> SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
> Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} -
> gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: 7CBF764A -
> gnupg fingerprint: 9288 F17D BBF9 9625 5ABC 285C 26A9 687E 7CBF 764A -
> (gnupg fingerprint: 3061 CFBF 2D88 F034 E8D2 7E92 EE4E AC98 48D0 359B)-
>
> --
> ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/