Auteur: Andreas Metzler Date: À: exim-dev Sujet: Re: [exim-dev] RFC: private vs. generic options in routers and
transports
On 2014-11-22 Heiko Schlittermann <hs@???> wrote:
[...] > Hm, a configuration file that is better readable is always a gain. A
> complex configuration is not always read or maintained by an expert.
Hello,
Well, for me personally distinguishing private router options does not
increase readability. If I set a option I need to understand what it
does and why I want it. The information that it is specific to the
redirect router or would apply to ipliteral router does not interest
me a lot.
But that is really just me personally, so I do not think it should
count for much in the discussion.
OTOH I have pretty good idea that renaming the option and dropping the
old name would cause loads of work for many people in the distribution
context (Debian).
BTW: Do we currently have router options that do not apply to all
routers but are shared by at least two of them?
cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
