Re: [exim] Urouteable address when send from remote host

On 25/04/14 09:29, Frodo Larik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the output show’s what I’m suspecting, it has something to do with local_domains and the routing of it, but I don’t know how to solve it, I’m probably missing some crucial info on the inner workings of Exim (I’m new to Exim, I normally run postfix, but sofar I like what I see, despite the problems ;-)).

>>>> check verify = recipient

It's running a check to see if the recipient (in some fashion) exists.
here's the detail; it's walking the chain of routers until one router
accepts the recipient.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> routing my.user@???

>>>> example.com in "! +local_domains"? no (matched "! +local_domains" - cached)
>>>> example.com in "lsearch;/etc/virtual/domainowners"? no (end of list)
>>>> example.com in "lsearch;/etc/virtual/domainowners"? no (end of list)
>>>> calling virtual_aliases_nostar router
>>>> virtual_aliases_nostar router declined for my.user@???

a router that (from the name) deals with aliases-without-stars) didn't
claim it

>>>> example.com in "lsearch;/etc/virtual/domainowners"? no (end of list)
>>>> calling virtual_aliases router
>>>> virtual_aliases router declined for my.user@???

nor this one

>>>> calling drop_solo_alias router
>>>> drop_solo_alias router declined for my.user@???

nor this one

>>>> calling system_aliases router
>>>> system_aliases router declined for my.user@???

nor this one

>>>> no more routers

oops, we've run out

>>>> ----------- end verify ------------
>>>> accept: condition test failed in ACL "check_recipient"
>>>> accept: endpass encountered - denying access

so obviously the user does not exist..

> 550 "Unknown User"
> LOG: H=mail.somedomain.com [x.x.x.x] F=<user@???> rejected RCPT my.user@???: Unrouteable address
> quit
> LOG: H=mail.somedomain.com [x.x.x.x] incomplete transaction (QUIT) from <user@???>
> 221 mail.example.com closing connection

So you need to look at these routers and infer what they're
intended to be doing, and which one ought to have accepted
your recipient.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy