On 2014-03-02 at 14:27 +0000, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> One's in the documentation, the other on the source. Which shall we
> settle on?
Crap; I renamed before the first release with the new functionality, on
the basis that it was safe, sorry for creating this mess.
The reasons for the rename still stand:
----------------------------8< cut here >8------------------------------
commit 0fbd9bff71b47e3a32e54629c3f67e7eda1812fe
Author: Phil Pennock <pdp@???>
Date: Sat Mar 23 19:46:22 2013 -0400
Rename dns_use_dnssec to dns_dnssec_ok.
This per Tony's suggestion; this makes it clearer that we are merely
setting resolver flags, not performing validation ourselves.
Well, clearer to those who understand DNSSEC. For everyone else,
they'll still be dependent upon a forthcoming new chapter to the
Specification.
----------------------------8< cut here >8------------------------------
I can go ahead and rename in docs, if people are happy with that, or
someone else can if you don't want to wait on me.
-Phil
